Customer Relationship Management System

Impact of AI on CRM Systems

Experiment Flowchart

The experiment underscores the substantial impact of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques on Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems, particularly in analyzing customer reviews. By leveraging advanced AI models such as CNN-LSTM, businesses can gain deeper insights into customer sentiment, enabling them to understand and respond to customer needs more effectively. The results demonstrate the model's capability to accurately classify sentiments, providing actionable data to improve customer satisfaction and tailor services strategically. This not only validates the model's effectiveness but also highlights its practical value and potential in real-world CRM applications.

1 Experiment Overview

This experiment utilizes a hybrid model combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to analyze customer review texts from "Jiji Hong Hotpot Chain". The aim is to extract sentiment tendencies from customer reviews, providing direct indicators of customer satisfaction for the company and supporting data-driven service improvement strategies.

1.1 Experiment Process

The experiment follows a comprehensive process to handle, analyze, and interpret customer review data. The main steps include:

1.2 Experiment Files Record

data_files

All generated data files and models are meticulously recorded and saved, ensuring the reproducibility of the experiment. These files include:

To facilitate future research and improvements, experimental flowcharts and other documents are also saved. Most of the data, excluding large files, are uploaded to Gitee and GitHub platforms for reference and use by other researchers.

2 Model Tuning Results

The constructed CNN-LSTM model underwent a series of training and validation phases, demonstrating its effectiveness as a sentiment analysis tool on the test set. Performance tuning revealed significant stages, as shown in Table 5.1.

Model Accuracy Recall Precision Specificity F1 Score
Initial Model 0.9147 0.1545 0.8947 0.9982 0.2636
Model_1 0.9321 0.6182 0.68 0.9706 0.6476
Model_2 0.9321 0.4545 0.7813 0.9821 0.5747

Initial model, despite high accuracy, showed low recall, indicating insufficiency in identifying negative sentiments. Model_1, during tuning, showed improvements in recall and F1 score, enhancing positive sentiment recognition. However, there was room for further optimization. Model_2, after meticulous hyperparameter adjustments, exhibited outstanding performance with significant improvements in precision and F1 score, balancing high accuracy and effective negative feedback capture.